Friday, May 29, 2009

Old hands, mature players

It is the Seniors Camrose this weekend, being played in Oxford. Team details are available on BGB and results will probably be updated most regularly on the EBU site.

Scotland has three experienced pairs and I expect them to do well. I would have expected them to win if the strongest Seniors pair (imho) had been available, but unfortunately family illness meant that they had to miss the trials. Even so I expect that winning is on the agenda with the Patron and England teams looking the ones to beat.

You can follow (at least) one match on BBO throughout the weekend (schedule).

As a side note, my uncle is the England NPC.

Update:

Scores after first round robin:
Scotland91
The Patron79
England73
Wales73
Northern Ireland70
Republic of Ireland62


Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Old hands

My first game with Reg for some time as we played in the Russell Cup. A few up and downs but we emerged with a respectable 55%.

We didn't have the methods to cope with this hand:



You would like to find the 6♦ contract that needs little more than a 3-2 break, but it's unclear what Reg should do differently. Clearly he has a nice hand with good controls, but at matchpoints any move beyond 3NT is really committing to a slam. With no obvious forward-going move and the meaning of a jump to 4NT unclear, I have a lot of sympathy for 3NT and we did score 11/18.

The diamonds were 3-2 and spades 4-2, and making 12 tricks in either of those suits or notrumps was fairly trivial. Only two pairs successfully bid slam. I know of one unsuccessful pair who tried 7♠ (presumably a real 'expert' auction) and there were two other -100s on the traveller.

Friday, May 15, 2009

Season close

Club's AGM last night and the end of the Berwick season.

The AGM passed off peacefully enough and the only debate was whether the club should invest in Bridgemates (or similar technology). I said that I could not really see the benefit of them in a small (typically 8-table) friendly club where few are interested in the immediate result - after all the results are on the web the next morning. The hassle of setting up the system, securing the components in the church hall, and handling all the various competitions (and their handicap systems) seemed a little out of proportion to the benefits to me. However the committee will look at it during its next meetings.

Comments welcome on this.

There was then a shortened evening of bridge. I played with Penny and we bid the following hand to slam and then I had to make it.



On a heart or spade lead this is a classic 'technical' hand. Non-experts may like to consider how they would play 6♥ from the South hand on a trump lead and I'll post how to play it on any lead in the comments in a couple of days.

Thursday, May 14, 2009

Today Santiago, tomorrow San Paulo?

Carl, our man in Lima, is representing Peru in the 59o Campeonato Sudamericano de Bridge in Santiago over the next week. At stake are places in the Bermuda Bowl this August, which is being held in 'nearby' Brazil.

My Spanish is not great, but I believe they play a full robin (9 teams), with the top 4 going into a play-off consisting of semifinals and final. Three teams will qualify for the Bermuda Bowl and I guess that Brazil and Argentina are the hot favourites.

The semifinals are being broadcast on BBO on May 21, so hopefully we'll have a chance to watch Carl.

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Keep a zero off your card

I played my first Russell Cup of the season with 'soon-to-ex-' junior Ronald. We managed to avoid any zeros, got a couple of tops, and were generally consistent as we scored 56% finishing fourth (of twenty).

Aside from a few boards on BBO we had not played before, but we played a simple system and did not have any mishaps. There were a couple of boards where better understanding of our signalling would have helped, but overall I was pleased how we played.

Ronald showed great restraint in the auction on board 7:


Even this contract proved too high and sound defence from Derrick and Julia held me to 8 tricks for a 33% board.

We both faced decisions on board 5 and were a little lucky to emerge with a joint top:


I would have opened 1NT with Ronald's hand but we hadn't discussed our thoughts on this. Over 2NT I could have bid 3♠ but concern about a club lead through the stopper made 3NT seem better - hopefully it would be tough to lead a diamond!

On the expected club lead Ronald wrapped up 10 tricks when the ♥K was singleton in the South hand. On a diamond lead we'd have made 9 tricks for average.

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

A New Trial

I have decided to play with Alex in the English Premier League this year and so will not be playing in the Scottish trials.

This is simply due to the desire to play more competitive bridge. The Premier League is a relatively new venture and it will be interesting to see how it develops and how we perform. It is our hope that it will improve our game by playing against better teams more frequently than is currently feasible.

Not that I think that I am anything more than a competent player, but I do enjoy serious competition and wish to be competitive in them. The decline of the Winter Foursomes means that there are no longer any significant weekend events in Scotland and the EPL provides three weekends of intense competition. Of course Alex is not eligible for the Scottish trials, while I am eligible for both England and Scotland (until such time as I actually play for one of them, as if), and so it makes sense to take advantage of the opportunity to play in the EPL.

In terms of playing for Scotland, a significant increase in time and money would be needed to build a partnership that could compete on the international stage, especially given the lack of major local events. The Scottish Cup is a serious event, more so than the Scottish trials actually, but one competition does not provide adequate preparation for a new pair. And maintaining my preferred partnership with my brother means that I have limited time and money to invest in a Scottish partnership.

But I remain fully committed to helping Scottish pairs and teams prepare for international competition and am still keen to be their coach and/or NPC if invited.

Monday, May 11, 2009

Farquharson Trophy

Cameron Farquharson, former SBU President, was introduced before the event and watched Liz and David for a session as 23 pairs contested the trophy he donated. This is an event for subscribers to SBU News and is not a particularly serious event, although there seemed to be a stronger field this year.

I was playing with Jenny and we scored around 58% in both sessions. The Farquharson has a history of scoring woes and this year was no different. First the scorer mistyped a lot of pair numbers in the first half, but this only caused minor differences in the scores and everyone was informed a couple of boards into the second session. Then session percentages, rather than matchpoints, were combined to produce the final result - we finished third but a quick check revealed that we would still be third, albeit by a single matchpoint, if scored correctly. So the final result was correct if not the scores. Ah, tradition!

The event was comfortably won by Liz and David, with Alan and Dee finishing above us. Perhaps a more predictable result than most pairs competitions.

After Jenny failed to play for a squeeze on the first board of the second half (which did not cost), I started pointing them out to her. This was the more impressive effort:


Wednesday, May 06, 2009

Is Deep Finesse wrong?

No, Deep Finesse is always right even though you might think otherwise. A hand from last night caused me to wonder:



According to DF West can make 11 tricks in spades but East can only make 10 tricks.

A first glance suggests this is probably right. North can lead a diamond to establish South's king, or lead a heart to give an immediate ruff.

And then you realise that this would be a (possible) reason that East could make more tricks than West, not the other way around. With East playing the hand it appears that South is almost endplayed at trick 1, so how can East make fewer tricks?

I'll leave it to the reader to work out why :)

Trophy goes east

We failed to win the Scott Cup last night, finishing below average in the final round and a country mile behind the winners, Reg, Malcolm, Brian and George (three of whom live just to the east of us).
Best
Four
1stM Copley, R Drysdale, G Martin, B Thomas6
2ndP & H Gipson, R French, D Drysdale7
3rdT Harris, C McConnachie, A French, D Elder8
4thC Edney, M McDonald, S Pearson, T Houghton9

This is the end of our season at the club and it will close for the summer after next week's AGM. LotG seems to have enjoyed playing more regularly but is looking forward to longer days in the garden ... when she's built it.

I'll be playing occasionally in the Russell Cup in Edinburgh and have the annual trip to the Summer Nationals, this year in Washington DC.

Tuesday, May 05, 2009

Board time

You play a lot of boards at the Spring Fours. Even more if you can actually play the game and make it through to the final day. But we didn't do that (but still played 200 boards over the weekend).

As last year the event drew 57 teams, but one dropped out at the last minute. The field was split into a number of head-to-head matches and some triads. There is a real advantage to being in a triad as you can get into round 4 just by winning the match on Saturday evening, whereas the head to head participants need to win two matches.

So we drew the #12 seed MOSSOP (John Carroll, Adam Mesbur, David Mossop, David Price, Colin Simpson & Gojko Zivkovic) for the first round. I knew David before he became a tax exile in Switzerland and was hoping that we could repeat the defeat that Sam and Stephen gave him at the same stage last year, but it was not to be. Two wrong slam decisions cost 25 IMPs and, more frustratingly, playing in a major fit rather than 3NT cost at least 30 IMPs to give them an easy victory.

In round 2 we played the unseed WILSON (Rob Procter, John Slater, Nick Smith & Alan Wilson). We all played a solid game and we came through this match by 27 IMPs. Wilson dropped into the first Punch Bowl round robin and would eventually be beaten by McIntosh in the semifinal of the consolation event.

In round 3 we played the #6 seeded team of sponsors and professionals of McIntosh (Ralph Katz, Andrew McIntosh, Reese Milner, Jack Mizel & Brian Senior). At least one of my readers knows Ralph well as he plays with her husband and he is currently hot-footing it back for the Cavendish (and then the US Trials) before we'll see him in Washington.

It proved a very close match. We were down by 8 IMPs going into the final set but solid play by Ralph and Tosh eeked out a further 13 IMPs and we were out of the main event. They would get knocked out in the next round by thegarv and company but would eventually win the Punch Bowl on Monday afternoon.

The big reason to play the Spring Fours as an event is that the subsiduary event is still very strong and well worth playing. On Sunday we played an all-day round robin group of 8 teams, needing to finish in the top two to qualify for the quarter-finals. We won 5 matches and drew one, but a big loss to the group winners meant that we would only finish 3rd.

And then on Monday we played in the strongest swiss teams event on the calendar. People are not taking it very seriously but the calibre of the teams is very high. We won two and lost four matches very narrowly and so finished above average. I'll post some of the more extreme hands later and perhaps highlight how a junior plays a 4-0 fit after partner has passed exclusion blackwood!

As always we thoroughly enjoyed the event and remains the best UK event by some considerable distance. The increased prize money over recent years has encouraged the top sponsors to attend, with a number of foreign stars coming in from Holland, Norway, USA, etc., and this encourages the top English teams to play too. Although an expensive event, the English juniors can play free when partnering another squad member, as Phil highlighted in an earlier comment. The hotel also provides excellent playing conditions, although I do wonder what our USA guests think of the hash browns at breakfast.

A lesson for the SBU? Increase the entry fee of the Winter Fours, improve the prize money and the playing conditions for the premier event, and perhaps we can improve the image and standard of the event. At least worth considering.